Important Introduction Related to Conspiracy
This article explores an invention related to Ether-based electrical technology by Clemente Figuera.
Who was Clemente Figuera?
He was a Spanish engineer, physics professor, and Chief Inspector of Mines.
He worked in Las Palmas, Canary Islands (Spain).
In 1902, he registered a patent, but there are no historical records of the patent ever being put into commercial use.
Figuera’s 1902 invention was titled "NEW PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING ELECTRICAL CURRENTS IN GENERAL AND APPLICABLE TO INDUSTRIAL USES." This invention had many advantages over Nikola Tesla’s alternating current (AC) generator.
Let me stick to the mainstream historical narrative for a moment: Nikola Tesla sold his AC technology to Westinghouse Electric in 1888, and by 1895 the hydroelectric power station at Niagara Falls (USA) was operational.
It’s possible Tesla sold Westinghouse an invention superior to Figuera’s 1902 device - but what’s recorded in history is AC technology. That’s just one possibility among many... assuming Nikola Tesla truly existed. On the other hand, if Tesla never existed as the official records claim, then we must consider far more complex scenarios. But that’s a long story not covered here.
So for now, let’s compare and analyze only the basics of what we do know.
We know major corporations will always pursue the best technology available for development. Figuera’s method of generating electricity was vastly superior to Tesla’s AC technology - primarily because Figuera’s machine did not generate back electromotive force (EMF) during energy production.
Yet, Westinghouse Electric did not adopt Clemente Figuera’s technology in the same era (1888–1902).
In school, we’re taught the basics of AC generators: magnets on the rotor spin around coils in the stator. When current is produced in the coil, and a closed circuit with load is present, back EMF arises, resisting the rotation of the rotor magnets.
Could it be that Clemente Figuera had already purchased Tesla’s technology, and the actual work was kept undisclosed?
If that’s the case, then official history failed to record the truth.
This raises a major question: In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with so many free energy technologies emerging, did corporations actually use them behind the scenes - while selling the public conventional energy systems?
What we usually hear in the media about the history of AC electricity is misleading. For example: Niagara Falls (1895) is often hyped up in American media as “the first hydroelectric plant” or “the birth of the electrical age.” But the truth is: Europe - especially Switzerland, Germany, and Austria - had already built and operated advanced hydroelectric plants well before 1890.
For the past 300 years, the most advanced science and technology have come primarily from Europe, yet the history of electricity in Europe is rarely highlighted. Clemente Figuera, like Tesla, was also European.
Clemente Figuera’s Technology – Magnet Generator – Free Energy Transformer 1902
For years, YouTube videos about free energy - both real and fake - have often used magnets. So whenever people hear about a “free energy generator,” they tend to imagine a device involving magnets. Hence, the term "Magnet Generator" has become shorthand for free energy. But Clemente Figuera’s device didn’t use permanent magnets - it used electromagnets (temporary magnets created by coiled wires around iron cores).
Some experts even refer to his invention as a Free Energy Transformer. While it does change voltage, its mechanism is nothing like a conventional transformer.
Figuera’s patent document has become smudged and stained over the years due to moisture. The official scan is faded, yellowed, and hard to read - as if it had been soaked in water or intentionally blurred.
Independent engineers have claimed:
- Copies of the original patent stored in Las Palmas disappeared after Figuera’s death in 1908.
- Only one faint copy remains - rediscovered by a digital free-energy research group sometime in the 1990s–2000s.
Technology researcher Patrick J. Kelly reconstructed the schematic based on the original patent description and the faded, smudged diagram.
Below is his research and reconstruction work, along with a redesigned version that uses electronic components to replace the rotating disk and carbon brushes.
THE COLOURING IS PART OF THE “WATER DAMAGE”. I UNDERSTAND THIS DIAGRAM TO BE THIS :
IN THIS ARRANGEMENT, A SMALL ELECTRIC MOTOR ROTATES THE CONTACT ARM “O” TO PROVIDE THE SWITCHING SEQUENCE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 REPEATEDLY. THE SWITCHING ARM IS ARRANGED TO BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN ANY TWO ADJACENT CONTACTS.
THE REASON FOR THIS UNUSUAL SWITCHING IS TO PROGRESSIVELY ALTER THE RATIO OF THE CURRENT FLOWING THROUGH THE TWO SETS OF (GREEN) PRIMARY ELECTROMAGNETS. THIS IS A CLEVER DESIGN WHICH AVOIDS THE LENZ’S LAW EFFECT AND BEING A SPLIT TRANSFORMER. THERE IS ALWAYS CURRENT FLOWING THROUGH EVERY PRIMARY ELECTROMAGNET AND THAT CURRENT NEVER CHANGES DIRECTION, NOR IS IT EVER INTERRUPTED, AND SO, THERE IS NEVER ANY BACK-EMF MAGNETIC FIELD TO DEAL WITH.
THE COILS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DIAGRAM ARE WIRE-WOUND RESISTORS OF HIGH POWER AND THE POSITION OF THE SWITCHING ARM “O” DETERMINES HOW MANY OF THOSE RESISTORS ARE BETWEEN THE BATTERY AND EACH SET OF PRIMARY ELECTROMAGNETS. THAT CAUSES A REPEATING CHANGE IN CURRENT STRENGTH BETWEEN THE TWO SETS OF ELECTROMAGNETS.
THE PATENT MARKS ONE SET OF ELECTROMAGNETS AS “S” AND THE OTHER SET AS “N” BUT THOSE REFERENCE LETTERS ARE MISLEADING AND DO NOT, REPEAT NOT, REFER TO MAGNETIC POLES. THE MAGNETIC POLES GENERATED WILL HAVE EITHER TWO NORTH POLES FACING EACH OTHER OR TWO SOUTH POLES FACING EACH OTHER. THE CHANGE IN CURRENT STRENGTH CAUSES A VARYING MAGNETIC FIELD IN THE CORE OF THE SECONDARY (YELLOW) ELECTROMAGNETS, AND THAT PRODUCES THE ELECTRICAL OUTPUT FROM THE GENERATOR. THAT OUTPUT WAS 500 VOLTS FOR FIGUERA’S PROTOTYPE.
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE PATENT DRAWING SHOWS SEVEN ELECTROMAGNETS IN EACH OF THE TWO CHAIN OF PRIMARY ELECTROMAGNETS. I ASSURE YOU THAT THE PERSON PREPARING THE PATENT DID NOT LOVE DRAWING SO MUCH THAT HE JUST HAD TO DRAW FOURTEEN ELECTROMAGNETS INSTEAD OF JUST TWO. NO, THERE IS A REASON THAT THERE ARE TWO SETS OF SEVEN. PERHAPS THIS IS JUST A WAY TO RAISE THE OUTPUT VOLTAGE AND OUTPUT POWER – YOU TELL ME.
IN 1908, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS WERE NOT READILY AVAILABLE LIKE THEY ARE TODAY. THEREFORE, IT IS NOW POSSIBLE TO USE AN ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT INSTEAD OF A MOTOR AND WIPER ARM. HOWEVER, THAT CHANGES THE QUALITY OF THE SWITCHING AND IT IS NOT AT ALL CLEAR WHAT EFFECT THAT MIGHT HAVE. BUT IT NEEDS TO BE STRESSED THAT THE COMMUTATOR
SHOWN IN THE PATENT IS ONLY FOR EXPLANATION PURPOSES AND SO DOES NOT ACTUALLY FORM PART OF THE DESIGN, AND INDEED, MAY HAVE BEEN INCLUDED AS DELIBERATE MISDIRECTION.
HOWEVER, IF WE DO INCLUDE THE COMMUTATOR, THE DESCRIPTION SHOULD HOLD AND SO THE GENERATOR SHOULD PERFORM AS DESCRIBED. IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT SWITCHING COULD BE PERFORMED LIKE THIS :
THIS IS A CONTINUOUSLY SWITCHING REHOSTAT WOUND ON AN IRON CORE :
THIS CORE IS WOUND WITH THICK WIRE – PERHAPS AWG#10 OR 12 SWG (2.3 x 2.3mm SQUARE WIRE). THE TURNS OF WIRE SHOULD BE TIGHT,TOUCHING SIDE-BY-SIDE AND SITTING FLAT ACROSS THE TOP. THE INSULATION IS REMOVED FROM THE TOP STRIP SO THAT TWO TURNS CAN BE CONTACTED BY A SLIDING BRUSH :
WITH THIS SYSTEM, THE OVERALL ARRANGEMENT IS LIKE THIS :
WHILE THE ABOVE SKETCH SHOWS A 12-VOLT BATTERY, THER IS NO REASON WHY THE BATTERY SHOULD NOT BE 24-VOLT OR 48-VOLT, ESPECIALLY IF THE WIRE USED TO WIND THE ELECTROMAGNETS IS SMALLER DIAMETER. THE STRENGTH OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD PRODUCED BY AN ELECTROMAGNET IS NOT RELATED TO THE AMOUNT OF POWER FED TO THE ELECTROMAGNET – A LARGER NUMBER OF TURNS OF THINNER WIRE WITH A SMALL CURRENT FLOWING THROUGH THE WIRE CAN CREATE A STRONGER MAGNETIC FIELD THAN A FEW TURNS OF THICK WIRE WITH A LARGE CURRENT FLOWING THROUGH THOSE TURNS.
IT IS PERFECTLY POSSIBLE TO PRODUCE THE SAME SWITCHING USING SEMICONDUCTORS. IN SPITE OF THE WIRE-WOUND RESISTOR BANK HAVING ONLY EIGHT CONNECTION POINTS, THE SWITCHING HAS TO HAVE SIXTEEN OUTPUTS DUE TO THE BACKWARDS AND FORWARDS SWITCHING SEQUENCE WHICH IS USED. A SOLID-STATE 16-WAY SWITCHING MODULE CAN BE CONSTRUCTED FROM TWO CD4017 DIVIDE-BY-TEN INTEGRATED CIRCUITS LIKE THIS :
THIS ARRANGEMENT GIVES SIXTEEN OUTPUTS IN SEQUENCE, SO TWO OUTPUTS NEED TO BE CONNECTED TOGETHER IN ORDER TO MATCH THE MECHANICAL SWITCHING WHICH CLEMENTE SHOWED. I AM RELUCTANT TO CONNECT TWO OUTPUTS DIRECTLY TOGETHER AND SO AN ISOLATION DIODE (PERHAPS 1N4148) WOULD BE REQUIRED ON EACH OUTPUT.
EIGHT POWER TRANSISTORS CAN BE USED TO ENERGISE EACH RESISTOR CONECTION POINT IN THE SEQUENCE REQUIRED. AS MECHANICAL SWITCHING WAS USED BY CLEMENTE, IT DID NOT MATTER WHICH WAY ROUND THE BATTERY WAS CONNECTED. WE CAN MATCH THE SWITCHING EXACTLY BY USING PNP POWER TRANSISTORS OR P-CHANNEL FETs. THAT WOULD BE LIKE THIS :
OR THE BATTERY CAN BE REVERSED FOR THE EASIER NPN OPTION :
3 - 6
HERE IS A POSSIBLE PHYSICAL LAYOUT :
A CONTRIBUTOR WHO WISHES TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS DOES NOT LIKE THE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT SHOWN ABOVE AND HE PREFERS THE FOLLOWING CIRCUIT WHICH HE HAS BUILT AND TESTED :
COMMENT : THE BDX53 TRANSISTOR IN THIS CIRCUIT IS NOT AVAILABLE EVERYWHERE AROUND THE WORLD (ALTHOUGH THE TIP 132 TRANSISTOR MAY BE AVAILABLE) AND IF SUPPLYS ARE DIFFICULT IN YOUR AREA THEN THE 2N2222 AND THE 2N3055 (OR TIP 3055) AS SHOWN ORIGINALLY WILL WORK JUST THE SAME.
🛒 Parts List for DIY Power Switching Coil Controller
Component | Description | Purchase Link |
|---|---|---|
2N3055 Power Transistor (NPN TO‑3) | NPN power transistor, TO‑3 package, ~15 A, 60 V, 115 W. High current switching for coil control. | Amazon offers packs 5‑20 pcs, e.g. “2N3055 Power Transistor 15 A 60 V TO‑3” |
CD4017BE CMOS Decade Counter (IC) | CMOS decade counter with 10 sequential outputs. Ideal for stepping through transistor gates. | |
NE555 Timer IC (pack of 50) | Classic timer/oscillator IC in DIP‑8. Generates clock pulses for CD4017. Texas Instruments genuine. | Available on Amazon (e.g. BOJACK NE555P or TI NE555 pack) ~ $5‑10 per pack |
Resistors, Capacitors, Diodes (generic) | 4.7 kΩ resistors for transistor base/gate; 10 000 µF 25 V electrolytic filter cap; 1N4001 diodes for flyback protection. | Widely available on Amazon or AliExpress in electronics starter kits |
Heatsink (TO‑3 mount) | Aluminum heatsink to dissipate heat from 2N3055 transistors, essential for high current operation. | Common accessory for receivers, power supplies on Amazon / AliExpress |
Coils (DIY enamel wire wound) | User‑wound copper coils (size & turns per schematic). Acts as alternating magnetic fields for induction. | Made by self-winding or purchase from electronics/hobby stores |
Power Supply (Battery) | 12 V–15 V DC supply (lead‑acid or rechargeable battery) to power the switching control circuit. |
Provide a technical drawing - or even a hand sketch - and metal workshop engineers can help draft and fabricate the cores accordingly once they understand the concept.
A simpler option: just take iron or steel rods (10mm diameter or more), and cut them for winding the coils!
Clemente Figuera’s optimized transformer core is shaped like an "I" and two "U" blocks, as shown below:
※ Transistorized snap-off tech harnesses energy from dielectric inertia.
What does Clemente Figuera’s invention have to do with Ether physics? Why was his invention suppressed?
The knowledge of magnetism in mainstream schools is incomplete and full of errors. The completeness and correctness belong to Ken Wheeler's Ether model. The above figure by physicist Ken Wheeler shows the dielectric twists at the poles of magnets (permanent and electromagnets).
The knowledge of magnetism in mainstream schools is incomplete and full of errors. The completeness and correctness belong to Ken Wheeler's Ether model. The above figure of physicist Ken Wheeler shows the dielectric twists at the poles of magnets (permanent and electromagnet).
※ Transistorized snap-off tech harnesses energy from dielectric inertia.